5
+
M
in writing
at the Butte Juston's
ив
4.O.
Nutter H. Elbis
14/1
t
I agree that (his would be a desirable
Extension
the low
f
if
we had only
Strugkong
and
Canton to take into account,
The
question is whether the precedent
would embarrass
.M. G. in de
G. in dealing
with other foreign powels.
I would consult the F.O.
He H.O., giving
On this point
as well cant
item a lead in favour
of the bill, subject to there possible
offjections.
And the Dimensions Office may like
to consider whether it could have
any possible bearing
on the American-
- Canadian negotiations about liquor
vayy
not
smuggling. I should liquor question is vir gencris
in
any
like
a
-
-
the
ands
there is something dangerously
precedent in our dangerous ducgs legislation, which could be more careful to the
Americans.
GG. 16.1.29.
As proposed.
27.1.28.
atonce
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.